4 ms·
> Can you though? Take a look at this Haskell program that LLM wrote. I do not write Haskell, but I can review the code just fine to say that this is doing wh
by bitpush 1y ago
> Can you though?
Take a look at this Haskell program that LLM wrote. I do not write Haskell, but I can review the code just fine to say that this is doing what I want.
-- Simple multiplication function
multiply :: Num a => a -> a -> a
multiply x y = x * y
-- Main function for running the program
main :: IO ()
main = do
putStrLn "Enter the first number:"
input1 <- getLine
putStrLn "Enter the second number:"
input2 <- getLine
let num1 = read input1 :: Double
let num2 = read input2 :: Double
let result = multiply num1 num2
putStrLn $ "Result: " ++ show num1 ++ " * " ++ show num2 ++ " = " ++ show result
If I had to write this by myself, it'd have taken atleast 20mins. First I have to be learn how main function is setup, how type definitions work, what putStrLn is, how to get an input, how to define a multiple function etc etc.
It really is an NP problem, come to think of it.
- skydhash 1y ago> First I have to be learn how main function is setup, how type definitions work, what putStrLn is, how to get an input, how to define a multiple function etc etc. So did you learn all of that from just glancing at this snippet?