3 ms·
American dollars shouldn’t go to things that aren’t sources of soft or hard power for us, and they should be clawed back from things that are sources of soft po
by landl0rd 1y ago
American dollars shouldn’t go to things that aren’t sources of soft or hard power for us, and they should be clawed back from things that are sources of soft power for china.
- disgruntledphd2 1y ago> American dollars shouldn’t go to things that aren’t sources of soft or hard power for us, and they should be clawed back from things that are sources of soft power for china. Fair enough. It's worth noting though, that China benefits when the US withdraws from stuff like this.
- landl0rd 1y agoChina has already thoroughly captured most of the whole UN. They would benefit if this weren’t already the case, which means stuff like closing VoA is still dumb. But UNESCO is among those they’ve captured. All removing funding does is reduce the power of a chinese agent.
- Angostura 1y agoIf they managed to capture it, how did they manage to capture it? And what will be the impact of the US surrendering?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- Angostura 1y agoAnd that’s fine, if that’s what you believe. But that has nothing to do with whether the UN has worked or not. “ This pick-up truck is dreadful as a tool for peeling bananas “