3 ms·
The same could be said of any worldview. So tell me—what part of UNESCO’s decision to admit the “State of Palestine” as a Member State strikes you as objectivel
by DemiGuru 1y ago
The same could be said of any worldview. So tell me—what part of UNESCO’s decision to admit the “State of Palestine” as a Member State strikes you as objectively righteous?
- ilaksh 1y agoI didn't say I thought it was objectively righteous. I didn't say anything about my worldview. It seems objective that many civilians have been killed and a lot of land stolen. But my point is that things that seem objective to one group of people might be objectively false to another group. Which isn't to say that there is no real truth. Just that the premises people hold are so different that the worlds are not compatible.
- DemiGuru 1y ago"...a lot of land stolen" let me just say that your limited understanding is painful.
- ilaksh 1y agoCan you explain? I'm going to ignore your arrogant decision because I am genuinely curious. What is it about Israeli "settlements" that makes it different from stealing land?
- DemiGuru 1y agoOnly in a morally inverted world is a nation blamed for keeping land it took while fending off an attack.