4 ms·

The python example you linked to http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2010/06/30/python-internals-adding-a-new-statement-to-python/ http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2010/06

The python example you linked to http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2010/06/30/python-internals-adding-a-new-statement-to-python/ http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2010/06/30/python-internals-add..., which shows an example of adding an 'until' keyword, requires you to recompile the python interpreter. From your article: "After making all the changes and running make, we can run the newly compiled Python and try our new until statement". Of course you can extend any language by recompiling it and creating a new interpreter. That is exactly my point! Perl lets you achieve the same thing simply by using a module from CPAN. I don't think you have been paying attention to what I have been saying. You keep mentioning that python has strong meta-programming. I never said anything about meta-programming. Perl, python, ruby, everybody can do meta-programming. I said that Perl lets you easily modify the core language grammar via 3rd party modules. This is an extremely powerful feature, if you took a second to think about it.

e12e 14y ago
Yes, I should have been clearer in my previous comment: What I meant to say was that I see what the previous poster meant, and I was wrong. However, if someone wants to do something similar in Python, here are how you would (have) to do it. I didn't mean to say that it was the same - or as straightforward. This is also why I linked to the r(estricted)python examples with pypy -- because they give you more of the power to define a whole language -- but that also isn't the same as being able to do it within the language itself. As for meta-programming, I have always meant that in the sense of lisp macros, not simply chaining some cleverly named functions. I'm still not convinced it's a feature I would want in Perl -- but then again, I don't particularly like Perl, and I don't use it -- so clearly what I think of it doesn't matter: I'm not the target audience for Perl features. Thankfully we don't all prefer the same tools :-)

e12e 14y ago

Yes, I should have been clearer in my previous comment: What I meant to say was that I see what the previous poster meant, and I was wrong. However, if someone wants to do something similar in Python, here are how you would (have) to do it. I didn't mean to say that it was the same - or as straightforward. This is also why I linked to the r(estricted)python examples with pypy -- because they give you more of the power to define a whole language -- but that also isn't the same as being able to do it within the language itself. As for meta-programming, I have always meant that in the sense of lisp macros, not simply chaining some cleverly named functions. I'm still not convinced it's a feature I would want in Perl -- but then again, I don't particularly like Perl, and I don't use it -- so clearly what I think of it doesn't matter: I'm not the target audience for Perl features. Thankfully we don't all prefer the same tools :-)