3 ms·
> One thing Go haters rarely reckon with is that Go is the only popular modern language (ie from this millennium). Everything else is way older. Rust. TypeScri
by Sesse__ 1y ago
> One thing Go haters rarely reckon with is that Go is the only popular modern language (ie from this millennium). Everything else is way older.
Rust. TypeScript. Swift.
- camgunz 1y agoI wrote a reply to a sibling comment here [0], but wanted to reemphasize that Rust and Swift are far from popular. I think it bears repeating because the gap between a Rust/Swift and Go is notable, but the gap between a Rust/Swift and Java is a chasm. I would guess this isn't the intuition of an HNer (it wasn't mine until I dug in for this discussion haha)
- ModernMech 1y agoThe median number of users across all programming languages is zero. Millions of people around the world use Rust and Swift, so it seems like a stretch to say they're far from popular. If Rust isn't a popular language compared to Java, we might just as well say Java is not a popular language compared to Excel.
- camgunz 1y agoI don't think millions of people use either Rust or Swift.
- Kranar 1y agoMillions of people don't use Go either.
- camgunz 1y agoYou got me
- moltonel3x 1y agoAccording to SlashData "size of programming language communities, Q1 2025": 28.0M JS+TS ... 5.6M Swift 5.1M Rust 5.0M Go They have measured Rust growing faster than Go over the years, with the overtake finally happening in Q1 this year. There aren't a lot of reports presenting absolute numbers and not biased toward a handful of platforms or ecosystems. If you know of other good free ones, feel free to share. https://research.slashdata.co/reports/6814fddffed4a97023eab098/pages/10 https://research.slashdata.co/reports/6814fddffed4a97023eab0...
- camgunz 1y agoThis is pretty intriguing but it wants me to make an account? Can I view it w/o doing that? EDIT: also I gotta say these numbers seem kinda high. It's hard for me to imagine there's ~28m JS programmers worldwide; that's 1/286 people in the entire world, and the ratio gets less believable as you shrink down the number of people who might have any access at all to a computer/internet/etc. Unless this definition is super broad, I'm quite skeptical.
- cheshire_cat 1y agoKotlin as well, although I think this is mostly because of Android?