4 ms·
AMD's new 96-core Threadripper CPU
- oblio 1y agoJust curious, are the older versions just... gone? It seems their availability is quite limited. Also, does Intel have something comparable?
- highfrequency 1y agoPricing is disappointing - no cheaper than the existing AMD server equivalent Epyc Turin 9655 ($11.5k for 96 cores). https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/server/epyc/9005-series/amd-epyc-9655.html https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/server/epyc/9005-... Significantly worse price/core than the earlier Threadripper 64 core 3990x for $3900.
- bryanlarsen 1y agoBecause it is the same chip, with higher clock speeds and different guarantees. The Threadripper WX series have a lot more bandwidth than the Threadripper X chips which will be considerably cheaper.
- FLHerne 1y ago3
- amelius 1y ago> The Pro 9000 WX-Series processors are also designed for local AI deployments, including fine-tuning models, inference, and AI application development. “When running a context-based prompting inference test using DeepSeek R1 32B, we are seeing a 49 percent better performance of Threadripper Pro 9000 over Intel,” claims AMD. Are they using the CPU as a GPU here?
- amy214 1y agoYup, that's a thing. Mostly along the lines of "CPU memory is cheap, GPU memory is expensive, if CPU performance is made good enough we can run really really big models for much less because of cheaper RAM"
- ai-christianson 1y agoI'm all for it. It enables those really big models with a relatively small number of active parameters.