3 ms·
> zero to fully running (...) in 5 seconds by just running helm install Realistically, a plain helm install without any values rarely if ever gives you the dep
by bo0tzz 1y ago
> zero to fully running (...) in 5 seconds by just running helm install
Realistically, a plain helm install without any values rarely if ever gives you the deployment you need, so you have to study the chart anyways.
> rollback on failure
This is hardly unique to helm.
> history metadata without (...) some external system
In 2025 you should probably be using gitops anyways, in which case the git repo is your history.
- 0xbadcafebee 1y ago> a plain helm install without any values rarely if ever gives you the deployment you need works for me most of the time > This is hardly unique to helm. So what? The guy was asking what is nice about Helm vs Kustomize. Does Kustomize have rollbacks? > In 2025 you should probably be using gitops Gitops is literally just "hey I have some configs in Git and I run some command based on a checkout", i.e. infrastructure as code in a git repo. Gitops does not track live server metadata and deployment history. I don't get why people over-inflate this idea.
- kkapelon 1y ago> Gitops is literally just... Please check https://opengitops.dev/ https://opengitops.dev/