3 ms·
It committed two extremely dangerous maneuvers in quick succession (one illegal), and the injuries to the people involved sound like they likely would have been
by MBCook 1y ago
It committed two extremely dangerous maneuvers in quick succession (one illegal), and the injuries to the people involved sound like they likely would have been much less if it had stopped as required by law.
Either way, it broke the law and killed someone. Does it matter if it was an act in 1 part or 5?
- abbotcabbot 1y ago> Does it matter if it was an act in 1 part or 5? If it had 5 errors 4 of which were not deadly due to random circumstances like no vehicle with right of way passing, then that is worse than if it committed one error that was deadly. I might fix the second implementation and scrap the first.
- 1970-01-01 1y agoThat is a yes for any legal definition of harm that results in death.