3 ms·
> Attackers being able to hijack the reputation of sites is problematic. And the whole point of this thread is that some sites have 0 reputation to hijack.
by Dylan16807 1y ago
> Attackers being able to hijack the reputation of sites is problematic.
And the whole point of this thread is that some sites have 0 reputation to hijack.
- charcircuit 1y agoYoutube does not have 0 reputation. The point of this thread is arguing the merits of requiring sites that don't handle sensitive informationfto use https.
- Dylan16807 1y agoNobody mentioned YouTube until your previous post. The example of 0 reputation was a ten year old blog post found via a comment. And "logins" were explicitly listed as important to secure, in that same comment. So that double covers YouTube for just about everybody.