4 ms·
> Surely it’s a good startup opportunity. I don't think there are many VCs willing to invest into this.
by znpy 1y ago
> Surely it’s a good startup opportunity.
I don't think there are many VCs willing to invest into this.
- calgoo 1y agoTechnically, if the VC and the startup is located in the blacklisted country i don't see why not. Basically we will start the torrent site like DNS witch hunt, but still possible. I assume the "elites" would not be too happy and do everything in their power to stop it?
- pinkmuffinere 1y agoTo be honest, making a business out of this might be the best way to convince regulators to close the loopholes. You could even devote N% of the revenue to closing the loopholes. There’s DEFINITELY a large moral hazard though, it would be very easy to lose your soul, or to be kicked out by the board in favor of a more malleable leader :/ Edit: after reading the article, I realize most of the “loopholes” to be changes are in disparate countries, not the _source_ country. This makes the whole idea less attractive. I suppose you could potentially still get rid of the anonymous-representative option by which people conceal their connection to different assets.