> how could you argue against that? I would argue against it if the downside is even more technological enslavement for billions. And while many improvements

> how could you argue against that? I would argue against it if the downside is even more technological enslavement for billions. And while many improvements to the human condition are rooted in technology, many of the problems of humanity are rooted in it as well. There might very well be an optimal point that we've already past.