3 ms·
> those are arguably not Bitcoin Q.E.D. You proved it’s a social consensus
by nivertech 1y ago
> those are arguably not Bitcoin
Q.E.D.
You proved it’s a social consensus
- olalonde 1y agoNaming things is, indeed. The protocol is not.
- freejazz 1y agoIncredibly pedantic, no less when this whole thing started with "seems like someone missed the boat"
- olalonde 1y agoWhat's incredibly pedantic is insisting that Bitcoin is based on "social consensus." That’s only true in the most superficial or tautological sense - like saying anything people agree to use is based on "social consensus". It doesn't explain at all how the Bitcoin protocol actually achieves consensus (proof of work).
- freejazz 1y agoCalling it social consensus isn't an attempt to describe how the protocol works because you are talking about two different things. The consensus on which protocol to use, and the workings of the protocol itself. You're response to me was to just verbatim repeat yourself while putting "no" in front of what I said. Incredibly pedantic discussion.
- andirk 1y agoThrough a lot of people agreeing on a standard.
- FabHK 1y agoConsensus is achieved through the longest chain rule. Sybil resistance is achieved through PoW.