3 ms·
For me, the ideal music player UI started and ended with Winamp, and I never liked any of the higher level ones, no need for music libraries etc. Recursive dire
by integricho 1y ago
For me, the ideal music player UI started and ended with Winamp, and I never liked any of the higher level ones, no need for music libraries etc. Recursive directory scan, delete what is not needed, flat playlist, can save any, the end. Also, the minimalistic window of Winamp is just perfect.
- bcraven 1y agoThe 'Win' in Winamp was referring to Windows. This is a Mac application.
- eviks 1y agoThere is a mac clone https://re-amp.ru/ https://re-amp.ru/
- notpushkin 1y agoNeat, but source code would be nice.
- integricho 1y agoThe platform is irrelevant, that UI design would apply to most platforms (MacOS for sure).
- kushalpandya 1y agoWinamp is OG, so why not both!
- kergonath 1y agoWinamp was annoying to use and the vast majority of the themes were butt ugly. iTunes’ single window streamlined UI was much better. It was perfectly happy with whatever recursive folder structure you wanted and its mini player window was just fine and was not an eye sore. The big advantage of Winamp was that it ran on Windows, and on ancient PCs at the time.