5 ms·
> The people I've seen who have talked about their engagement numbers Now do bluesky. X is doing fine. Turns out network effects are real.
by SV_BubbleTime 1y ago
> The people I've seen who have talked about their engagement numbers
Now do bluesky. X is doing fine. Turns out network effects are real.
- tristan957 1y agoI've seen people report they get better engagement on Mastodon and Blue Sky than they ever did with Twitter, based on percentages.
- SV_BubbleTime 1y agoAnd I’ve seen people report the complete opposite. Both can be true. The reality is BlueSky pushed echo chambering even harder than X and it’s a dying platform - maybe those two things are unrelated but not for me they aren’t. Unless some miracle happens to reverse its trend, BlueSky already had its shot.
- tristan957 1y agoLuckily Blue Sky isn't the only competitor in the space, then.
- SV_BubbleTime 1y agoYes, right. There is mastadon - dead for mass market, threads - dead entirely. How many times do people need to be told that network effects are really real?
- tristan957 1y agoThreads reports having hundreds of millions of monthly active users.
- api 1y agoI have no interest in any of them. The Twitter-style format is inherently toxic and always devolves into a trolling competition or echo chambers. The short format prioritizes stupid takes that fit in a sentence or two over well thought out ideas.
- slater 1y agoHow is Bluesky a dying platform...? o.0
- wasabi991011 1y agoAnecdotal, but everone that I've heard do those comparisons have done Bluesky vs X, and every time they've noticed better engagement ratio and higher quality engagement on Bluesky.
- SV_BubbleTime 1y agoYeah. I’m sure. Liberal echo chamber gets lots of liberal echos. Works until you realize that you’re just talking to yourself.