3 ms·
> they rightly commented that if this was allowed to stand, the FTC and every government agency would just always estimate low in these cases. I think you miss
by pinkmuffinere 1y ago
> they rightly commented that if this was allowed to stand, the FTC and every government agency would just always estimate low in these cases.
I think you missed this — it isn’t some arbitrary reason to rule in an anti-consumer way. There is good reason to do so. Imo we should keep our checks and balances strong, and this is one small action that does that.
- antonvs 1y ago> Imo we should keep our checks and balances strong I think the tense of this sentence is not quite right. Something more like "Make checks and balances strong again" would work.
- pinkmuffinere 1y agoHaha, ya I agree with that too
- bagels 1y agoThere are always reasons on both sides of a case
- mring33621 1y agoso, small questionable wins for normal people would break the system while big, veeeeerrrrry questionable wins for some subset of the elite are OK?
- AlexCornila 1y agosure bud .. wake the fck up