4 ms·
Because systematic corruption presumably?
by dboreham 1y ago
Because systematic corruption presumably?
- jibe 1y agoIf you are sniffing out corruption, aren’t the ones flouting required procedures likely the corrupt ones?
- Aeolun 1y agoKinda, but corruption in my favor is unlikely to see me complain about it.
- wrasee 1y agoThat’s obviously no justification, all corruption is in someone’s favour. Society functions by rules. Break those founding principles and you break everything.
- wqaatwt 1y agoWhat if the “required procedures” are held in place by corruption?
- hshdhdhj4444 1y agoAlmost never. Whistleblowers are almost always revealing information that they are legally prevented from revealing, otherwise you wouldn’t need a whistleblower. A simple FOIA request would suffice.
- tbrownaw 1y agoMore that they mistakenly thought that doing the right thing meant they didn't have to do the thing right.
- bjt12345 1y agoBut, if you want to make it look like you are doing the right thing but don't want to be remembered as having done that right thing, maybe this was the right thing to do given that now it won't be done.
- techpineapple 1y agoRight, if they were screwing over customers, we’d call it disruption and give them a medal, if not $1 billion dollars. Since they’re trying to help people, we wag our fingers at them.
- weberer 1y ago>they were flouting required procedures