As I recall, the majority of these paradoxes are resolved by the observation that you can't get a free measurement, for one system to measure another - both mus

As I recall, the majority of these paradoxes are resolved by the observation that you can't get a free measurement, for one system to measure another - both must interact. So either 1. You Perform some form of strong measurement which is certain to perturb both systems - leading to the collapse of entanglement etc. and various constraints collapsing. 2. You perform a weak measurement which leaves the opposing systems in probabilistic states which must still be consistent. 3. You perform no measurement and each system maintains an internally consistent statistical distribution over possible states. The paradoxes show up when you assume there is a free measurement which does not perturb either system - or only perturbs one system.