So the assumptions are: 1. An agent can analyze another system, even a complex one including other agents, using quantum mechanics 2. This assumption of consi

So the assumptions are: 1. An agent can analyze another system, even a complex one including other agents, using quantum mechanics 2. This assumption of consistency, that the predictions made by different agents using quantum theory are not contradictory 3. If an agent’s measurement says that the coin toss came up heads, then the opposite fact — that the coin toss came up tails — cannot be simultaneously true. But isn't everything you measure in quantum mechanics probabilistic? E.g. the article itself gives the example of measuring a polarized photon at 45 degrees giving 50/50 chance of each outcome So all 3 assumptions have an issue: 1: even if you can analyze it, you're analyzing just probabilistic data anyway. 2: why expect consistency if your results are probabilistic? 3: I thought the whole concept of superposition was both options being simultaneously true What am I missing here that makes this paradoxical?