> Kent himself argued otherwise here[1]. I said "main" for a reason. The current users that need to recover data are a part of the picture, but they're a few

> Kent himself argued otherwise here[1]. I said "main" for a reason. The current users that need to recover data are a part of the picture, but they're a few trees out of the forest. "Please tell that to the users who lost data." is not arguing against what I said. > And even if that were the case, there's no need to take a stand on trying to get it into the kernel. If he gets booted out of the kernel tree, then the end result is the same for his users: they have to compile their own kernel. So it makes no sense to push this so hard. He's not giving an ultimatum here. The goal is to figure out something that works for everyone.