3 ms·
> deserves credit for calling out something important that rarely gets discussed: the importance of emotion for producing great art That’s subjective though.
by kcplate 1y ago
> deserves credit for calling out something important that rarely gets discussed: the importance of emotion for producing great art
That’s subjective though. An opinion I agree with, but still subjective.
I think it’s within the realm of possibility given the advances we have seen so far that a near future AI given enough input describing emotion could simulate it just enough for people to accept that it created a “decent” work. Likely undetectable by most people as AI created vs human created.
> we have no idea how to solve these problems.
Yet. Obviously time and talent moved us from Eliza to ChatGPT/Gemini. Is it really unlikely that time and talent can’t push us over the artificial emotion precipice as well? I am not betting against it.
- timr 1y ago> Yet. Obviously time and talent moved us from Eliza to ChatGPT/Gemini. Time being the big word there. Eliza came out in the 1960s. >Is it really unlikely that time and talent can’t push us over the artificial emotion precipice as well? I am not betting against it. Nor am I. I'm just not making hyperbolic claims concerning the timeline. For all we know, the next major advance will take another 60 years.
- kcplate 1y ago> the next major advance will take another 60 years It might, or it might be next week.