3 ms·
Bots don't make that much spelling mistakes. Bots as in LLMs not people paid to engage. My good uv experience. I tried installing tensor/cuda Python code recen
by Ygg2 1y ago
Bots don't make that much spelling mistakes. Bots as in LLMs not people paid to engage.
My good uv experience. I tried installing tensor/cuda Python code recently. Plain pip just failed. uv pip actually returned WHY it failed.
It definitely felt like magic.
- tuesdaynight 1y agoI wouldn't be so sure about spelling mistakes. Even before LLMs, YouTube bots made a lot of mistakes (probably because gives the impression that it's a human typing). Currently, it's impossible to distinguish between a human and LLM comment.
- coldtea 1y ago>Bots don't make that much spelling mistakes. They do if you instruct them to.
- Ygg2 1y agoWhy would you want them to make spelling errors? The benefits don't outweigh the costs.
- coldtea 1y agoIf the intention is "increase believability a real human wrote this bot message" they do
- Ygg2 1y agoSure but adding error rate also makes it so you trust the speaker less, because they aren't educated enough or ESL.
- coldtea 1y agoSince sprinkling some mistakes makes you appear human, as opposed to a spam bot, people would be trusting you more, not less. Not to mention the relatability aspect ("he's a plain dude, making mistakes and all, not some over-educated schmuck")