4 ms·
Is there some reasonable way to self host a (secure) voice chat channel?
by worldsayshi 1y ago
Is there some reasonable way to self host a (secure) voice chat channel?
- denkmoon 1y agoTeamspeak
- derkades 1y agoMumble!
- udev4096 1y agoMumble is awesome but definitely difficult to properly configure. Especially the TLS certs for any reverse proxy won't work directly, there's a hacky way to make it work which I don't fully trust
- MattJ100 1y agoI work on a project in this space, and the endless insistence of people that they have to run clearly non-web things through reverse proxies always amazes me :) Not everything is a web app, and it's trivial these days to obtain certificates, even without a proxy (certbot, etc.). Of course I understand that if you host a lot of web apps, having all web requests routed through a universal proxy is nice for various reasons. But platforms like Discord and such are complex beasts and use more technologies than HTTP(S).
- udev4096 1y ago> I understand that if you host a lot of web apps The only reason. Plus, it's a single source of truth and configuring an auth with a reverse proxy is far easier
- c22 1y agoDepending on your definition of reasonable, you could just pipe the audio over SSH: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/116919/redirect-sound-microphone-via-ssh-how-to-telephone-via-ssh https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/116919/redirect-sou...
- udev4096 1y agoWow, I never thought you could ssh your audio. That's so fucking awesome
- abdullahkhalids 1y agoJust create a second group in signal with your friends called "group X: call only". Then everyone mutes the group (which I think mutes calls as well). Then whenever someone wants to join the "voice chat" they can just initiate a call. If someone else sees and joins, so be it.