3 ms·
This implies that executive orders should be the status quo, which deviates from the design of the American system of government. The courts should not be routi
by tmountain 1y ago
This implies that executive orders should be the status quo, which deviates from the design of the American system of government. The courts should not be routinely blocking the president because the president should not be routinely ruling by executive order. This change paves the way for additional power concentrated in the executive branch which is already far too powerful. It is the next step towards an authoritarian regime and no good will come from this ruling.
- nradov 1y agoHaving a strong federal government in the first place deviates from the design of the American system of government. We ought to eviscerate federal government power and devolve most executive power back to the several States. That would make national politics far less contentious.
- krapp 1y agoWe tried that. It was called the Continential Congress, and it was a spectacular failure. If you want the US to be a loose confederation of 50 sovereign nations, fine. Just hope you live in California, New York or Texas, because every other state is going to devolve into the American equivalent of Eastern Europe.
- int_19h 1y agoThe Continental Congress failed because it gave the federal government too little power, but that was fixed with the US Constitution. There was that long time period between that and Wickard v. Filburn, you know.
- AnimalMuppet 1y agoTrue. And yet, in that world, what we would have is judges blocking acts of Congress instead.