3 ms·
Not only is that comment a false dichotomy (we can both explore space and make humanity more sustainable at the same time), it also presumes that space explorat
by usuallyalurker 1y ago
Not only is that comment a false dichotomy (we can both explore space and make humanity more sustainable at the same time), it also presumes that space exploration and sustainability are at odds with one another and not synergistic.
Humans, simply by existing on Earth, have a huge and often negative impact on the environment. If we could somehow shift the human population off Earth, either by terraforming planets (like Mars) or creating artificial space habitats, it would have a huge positive impact on Earth's environment. We don't currently have the technology to do so - we would need space elevators to feasibly move humanity off Earth - but that doesn't mean we should move our attention away from space in the meantime.
- nradov 1y agoIt's silly to think that eliminating human impact on Earth's environment is a positive goal. What's the point? Humans are literally part of the environment. (That doesn't mean we should cause wanton damage.) Even if it was possible to live in space I would stay right here, and I make no apologies for my impact.
- MrMorden 1y agoWe can't even terraform the Empty Quarter. Doing it to Mars and then somehow giving that planet a magnetic field is fantasy.