8 ms·
Quebec provides universal childcare for less than $7 a day
- xhkkffbf 1y agoCertainly that's not the full cost. It just subsidizes it heavily. (Not that it's a bad idea to do so. Just that $7 isn't the real cost.)
- spacechild1 1y agoI think everyone is aware of that.
- rufus_foreman 1y agoSo you have flagged the inaccurate headline then?
- stevenwoo 1y agoThe article has sources that claim even with the subsidies it generates profit due to enabling mothers to work (and opening up jobs for single parents) plus higher paying jobs for childcare based on studies done originally in multiple trialed places in the USA that made the same claim - for each dollar put in, the government got back twelve roughly. Simply -a mother that doesn’t work doesn’t generate income tax and children who grow up in poor environments have bad outcomes that cost the government money. No where does the article claim that the parents shoulder the actual cost.
- arresin 1y agoDo those stats take into account the negative externality of the child being raise for a large portion of its most critical years by a stranger instead of the mother (or father)?
- pedalpete 1y agoThat sounds like very much a strawman argument. Parents need to have the income to support the family. They end up putting the child in childcare and taking on extra-work or if they are fortunate to rely on family members to afford childcare.
- Tarsul 1y agowhy do you assume that it's a negative externality?
- toomuchtodo 1y agoOne should consider the parents who would’ve never had children if they couldn’t have someone watch their child while they work, either because they had to or would prefer to work vs perform child rearing. Should you not have children if a parent can’t be home during their early childhood years? That’s more philosophical.
- fathomdeez 1y agoDid you go to high school, bn-l?
- plantwallshoe 1y agoChild care providers build strong relationships with the kids they take care of, they’re hardly strangers.
- arresin 1y agoAs much as their mother (or father)?
- stevenwoo 1y agoThat appears to be some other argument you want to make - are you claiming the roughly seventy five percent of children in the USA who do not have a stay at home parent are damaged? Is your solution to let these children drown or to pay more for the parent to stay at home or some thing else?
- mslansn 1y ago[flagged]
- Canada 1y ago[flagged]
- mystified5016 1y ago[flagged]
- syeare 1y agoTaxation without representation could not be juvenile thinking, it's a founding concept of my country which seems to be lost today
- guitarbill 1y ago> Taxation without representation could not be juvenile thinking, it's a founding concept of my country which seems to be lost today If by "my country" you mean the US, it's perfectly happy with taxation without representation. Current examples include the District of Columbia, certain situations in U.S. territories, and permanent residents. Past examples e.g. women.
- arresin 1y agoIt depends where the gov spends it. And it’s more like mugging because theft doesn’t necessarily imply there’s a gun whereas with taxation there is.
- aeries 1y agoIsn't OP just arguing that, on balance, the other provinces subsidize Quebec via federal taxes?
- 486sx33 1y ago[dead]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 1y ago