3 ms·

Love UV! Also love Ruff from the Astral team. We just cut our linting + formatting across from pylint + Black to Ruff. Saw lint times drop from 90 seconds to

• greatgib 1y ago
  Until the moment you will realize that ruff perform only a part of pylint checks and that very obvious mistakes can go through easily like code that can't run because of an obvious error.
  • oblio 1y ago
    Which checks is it missing?
    • js2 1y ago
      Many, but it also has many that pylint does not. I use them both, ruff first, followed by pylint. https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/faq/#how-does-ruffs-linter-compare-to-pylint https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/faq/#how-does-ruffs-linter-compa... https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970
      • _flux 1y ago
        Seems though mypy/pyright/pyre/pyrefly or the future ty could bridge the gap, if one is writing typed python?
        • greatgib 1y ago
          The big question will be to know if tools will still be fast once they will have added the tests that are missing.
  • jsmeaton 1y ago
    Do you have an example of this?
    • js2 1y ago
      It's in the documentation: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/faq/#how-does-ruffs-linter-compare-to-pylint https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/faq/#how-does-ruffs-linter-compa... https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970