3 ms·
> Mineral rights are dominant over surface rights in most jurisdictions, including other states like California. To call it "insane" just shows how little exper
by Dylan16807 1y ago
> Mineral rights are dominant over surface rights in most jurisdictions, including other states like California. To call it "insane" just shows how little experience Mr. R has in land development.
The insane part is the management of mineral rights, shattering into a thousand untracked shards and too ruinous to insure against without waivers. Not the existence of them.
> The area OP is trying to develop in is a QOZ for a reason; he should have expected there to be upgrades necessary to delivery that level of power to a substation in an area where nothing else is going on.
The biggest problem was that it still needed a ton of limitation even with upgrades.
- bz_bz_bz 1y agoYou think either of those problems are Texas-specific? Seems like people who zero industry experience got a taste of common issues that renewable developers deal with on a daily basis nationwide and decided that it must be Texas’ fault.
- Dylan16807 1y agoI don't think either I or the article claimed those problems were Texas-specific. Are all those mineral rights issues exactly the same across the entire country? Even if so they make for an insane system.