4 ms·
Even so, mass media today is better posed to present a shared language. I'd go as far as to think that there is a shared language in society today, but it's mo
by tolerance 1y ago
Even so, mass media today is better posed to present a shared language.
I'd go as far as to think that there is a shared language in society today, but it's more like athletes jawing off amongst each other than something like what we expect the effects of culture and art to be.
- citizenpaul 1y agoTech doesn't change human nature. We are still the same as 100,000 years ago without tech.
- tolerance 1y agoIn my original comment, I said that I believe that our brains are rewired but our spirits still crave the same things as before. Tech changes the actions and reasonings behind how our nature is exercised, at the material level. Now, if you don't believe in the material/immaterial dichotomy that typifies man then what I'm saying may not register. I'm not sure if this applies to you, but either way I'm curious what made you make the claim that took us in this direction because it's apparent that you've noticed a logical step that I was only aware of subconsciously. Thanks.
- chairmansteve 1y agoTech changes human culture. The changes are at a population, statistical level. Asimovs Foundation book described it well.
- hoseja 1y agoExcept for the thousands of years of civilizational-directed breeding in parts of the globe.
- ljsprague 1y agoYou can share a language and still talk past each other.