3 ms·

I'm not sure I understand what you mean, perhaps my comment sounded snarky? But I don't think it's unwarranted either. 9/11 was not a direct response to any US

I'm not sure I understand what you mean, perhaps my comment sounded snarky? But I don't think it's unwarranted either. 9/11 was not a direct response to any US invasion, but the London and Madrid bombings were a direct response to the second Iraq invasion. I would be surprised if there will be no terrorist attacks on American soil.

firesteelrain 1y ago
In those cases it was performed by non state actors Iran is a state which cannot project power. If they do try to hit the homeland via proxy you can almost guarantee we will hit back harder. They didn’t do much after we killed their general who also was a sponsor of terrorism in the region. Any effects will be regionalized
- the_gipsy 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - firesteelrain 1y ago
    [flagged]
    - the_gipsy 1y ago
      [flagged]
      - firesteelrain 1y ago
        Not going to happen Iran will do some nominal attacks. There is little power projection that they will do. I bet they will focus their attacks on Israel which has been happening already.
        the_gipsy 1y ago
        But why not? Do you think that the general sentiment is somehow gone? Or that you can submit terrorists by force?
        firesteelrain 1y ago
        Because Iran's leadership isn’t stupid. They know a full-on attack against the US would bring overwhelming retaliation and possibly collapse the regime. They've been hit before (like when Soleimani was killed) and their response was pretty measured. They’ll do something to save face. Maybe hit a US base through proxies or ramp up attacks on Israel-but a direct war with the US? Not worth it for them. Too much to lose.
        the_gipsy 1y ago
        9/11 and the other attacks were not a war, precisely. You'll get a decade of terrorism, and the more you bomb Iran the worse it will get.
        firesteelrain 1y ago
        I don’t think we’d see something like 9/11 again. Attacks on the US homeland bring a level of blowback that even Iran’s hardliners would want to avoid. But I totally agree there’ll be fallout in the region. Expect more proxy attacks on US bases, shipping lanes, and of course Israel. That kind of long, drawn-out pressure is way more in line with how Iran operates. Not total war But why does Iran get to take workers hostage for 444 days in 1979, conduct Beirut embassy bombing in 1983, then the Beirut barracks bombing in same year, 1982-1991 Hezbollah (Iran sponsored) kidnappings of Americans in Lebanon, TWA 847 Hijacking, December 1983 Kuwait Embassy Bombing, June 1996 Khobar Towers Bombing, multiple EFP attacks on US forces in Iraq, May 2011 Camp Liberty Rocket Attack, 2011 IRGC plot to assassinate US officials, Dec 2019 Kirkuk base attack, etc How is this any different than your 9/11 scenario and Iran has been doing it for 40 years?
        1y ago

firesteelrain 1y ago

In those cases it was performed by non state actors Iran is a state which cannot project power. If they do try to hit the homeland via proxy you can almost guarantee we will hit back harder. They didn’t do much after we killed their general who also was a sponsor of terrorism in the region. Any effects will be regionalized

the_gipsy 1y ago
[flagged]
- firesteelrain 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - the_gipsy 1y ago
    [flagged]
    - firesteelrain 1y ago
      Not going to happen Iran will do some nominal attacks. There is little power projection that they will do. I bet they will focus their attacks on Israel which has been happening already.
      - the_gipsy 1y ago
        But why not? Do you think that the general sentiment is somehow gone? Or that you can submit terrorists by force?
        firesteelrain 1y ago
        Because Iran's leadership isn’t stupid. They know a full-on attack against the US would bring overwhelming retaliation and possibly collapse the regime. They've been hit before (like when Soleimani was killed) and their response was pretty measured. They’ll do something to save face. Maybe hit a US base through proxies or ramp up attacks on Israel-but a direct war with the US? Not worth it for them. Too much to lose.
        the_gipsy 1y ago
        9/11 and the other attacks were not a war, precisely. You'll get a decade of terrorism, and the more you bomb Iran the worse it will get.
        firesteelrain 1y ago
        I don’t think we’d see something like 9/11 again. Attacks on the US homeland bring a level of blowback that even Iran’s hardliners would want to avoid. But I totally agree there’ll be fallout in the region. Expect more proxy attacks on US bases, shipping lanes, and of course Israel. That kind of long, drawn-out pressure is way more in line with how Iran operates. Not total war But why does Iran get to take workers hostage for 444 days in 1979, conduct Beirut embassy bombing in 1983, then the Beirut barracks bombing in same year, 1982-1991 Hezbollah (Iran sponsored) kidnappings of Americans in Lebanon, TWA 847 Hijacking, December 1983 Kuwait Embassy Bombing, June 1996 Khobar Towers Bombing, multiple EFP attacks on US forces in Iraq, May 2011 Camp Liberty Rocket Attack, 2011 IRGC plot to assassinate US officials, Dec 2019 Kirkuk base attack, etc How is this any different than your 9/11 scenario and Iran has been doing it for 40 years?
        1y ago