12 ms·
with the lack of a war happening between them? neither side invaded or killed 800 of the other's citizens and US/china didnt step in to back their horse with bo
by samrus 1y ago
with the lack of a war happening between them? neither side invaded or killed 800 of the other's citizens and US/china didnt step in to back their horse with bombs
- motorest 1y ago> with the lack of a war happening between them? What was this, then? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_conflict https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_co...
- samrus 1y agothats what a "war" looked like when both parties have nukes ukraine is what a war looks like when both parties dont have nukes
- azan_ 1y agoIn case of Ukraine one party has nukes, the biggest nuke arsenal in the world actually
- the_af 1y agoThat's what they meant: that's what war looks like when both parties don't have nukes. It's usually the defending party which benefits from nukes the most; and both parties having nukes makes every war a very dangerous affair (if it goes unchecked, as opposed to limited like India-Pakistan).
- donkeybeer 1y agoI think it was meant like not (A has nukes and B has nukes) rather than (not A has nukes) and (not B has nukes). Strange wording, I felt the same way too.
- samrus 1y agoThats what i meant. Unles both parties have nukes, it will become a proper war where countries are destroyed Looking at india pakistan, and ukraine russia, its clear whether you should give your nuclear arsenal up or not
- mcphage 1y agoThe thing that lasted 4 days and had less than 100 people killed?