3 ms·
why should US taxpayers subsidize a service for which non-US citizens could get a benefit from without paying any taxes? "The gov't should pay for it" is not a
by chii 1y ago
why should US taxpayers subsidize a service for which non-US citizens could get a benefit from without paying any taxes?
"The gov't should pay for it" is not a solution to private problems.
- Y_Y 1y ago> why should US taxpayers subsidize a service for which non-US citizens could get a benefit from without paying any taxes? Because US citizens would benefit? Preventing outsiders from incidentally benefiting isn't a constitutional mandate (yet). Would you oppose an anti-pollution measure even though it would also provide cleaner air to neighbouring countries?