3 ms·

Again, in case it's not clear: I was being whimsical. I'm obviously not resting my opposition to this on a one-off argument about dust in my apartment. I perso

by timr 1y ago

Again, in case it's not clear: I was being whimsical. I'm obviously not resting my opposition to this on a one-off argument about dust in my apartment. I personally don't think the PM2.5 thing would justify the implementation of the system even if it were true, but that's not a debate I want to get into.

ceejayoz 1y ago
> Again, in case it's not clear: I was being whimsical. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schrodinger%E2%80%99s%20douchebag https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schrodinger%... The benefits of reducing PM2.5 pollution are... not in dispute. https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-ef...
- timr 1y ago
  > https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schrodinger%E2%80%99s%20douchebag https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schrodinger%... I've been nothing but polite to you.
  - ceejayoz 1y ago
    In the Southern belle “bless your heart” sense, perhaps. In the “good faith arguing” sense, no.
    - timr 1y ago
      In the "I literally didn't insult you and call you names" sense.
      - ceejayoz 1y ago
        I’d rather be called names than have some argue in bad faith.
maybelsyrup 1y ago
https://x.com/dril/status/549425182767861760 https://x.com/dril/status/549425182767861760