5 ms·
Is there a figure somewhere on how many TB of images this will produce per day when running in automated sky survey mode?
by walrus01 1y ago
Is there a figure somewhere on how many TB of images this will produce per day when running in automated sky survey mode?
- Jgrubb 1y ago> The vast archive, growing by 20 terabytes each night, will after 1 year contain more optical astronomy data than that produced by all previous telescopes combined.
- 9dev 1y ago73 PB over the full runtime of the survey. That’s a nice new datacenter filled to the brim with images.
- jl6 1y agoProbably about 10 racks if using dense HDDs.
- jankeymeulen 1y agoStorage densities these days are kinda amazing, it's not that much of a datacenter. Assuming you chunk it with triple redundancy, that's 220k TB raw. 10k 22 TB disks, you put them in one of those 4U 50 disk storage pods. 200 pods, 10 of those in a rack with some space left for a switch and power, so that's only 20 racks.
- LiamPowell 1y agoOnly 50 disks? WD sells a 102 disk 4u box and Seagate sells a 106 disk one.
- ethan_smith 1y agoThe Rubin Observatory will generate approximately 20TB of raw image data per night, with an annual data production of about 15PB for the 10-year survey.
- blop 1y agoI found this pdf presentation with lots of great technical details about data management and a devops infra oriented view of this telescope: https://ci-compass.org/assets/602137/2025jan23_cicompass_rubin.pdf https://ci-compass.org/assets/602137/2025jan23_cicompass_rub... Worth a read for the devops guys around here! - about 20TB per day, around 100PB expected for the whole survey - 0.5PB ceph cluster for local data - workloads on 20 nodes kubernetes cluster/argocd - physical infra managed with puppet/ansible - 100Gbs(+40Gs backup) fiber connection to US-based datacenter for further processing
- Melatonic 1y agoInsanity - love it
- cycomanic 1y agoIf you think this is insanity I encourage you to look up the expected data to come out of the SKA. Even after several processing steps they expect several hundred PB/year (the raw data which is not being archived is several orders of magnitude more). That is only SKA-low I think for SKA-mid we are talking Exabyte/year. I recall that their chief scientist said once they are operational they will process more data than google and facebook combined.
- cb321 1y agoYeppers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_Kilometre_Array https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_Kilometre_Array In-page search for "data challenges". Pfew, that's a lot of data.
- newpavlov 1y agoI wonder if they could reduce the data size at rest by using specialized compressing techniques. Your probably could build an averaged "model" of the sky observed by the telescope (probably with account for stellar parallax and bright planets) and store only compressed diffs, not full images. But I guess, since storage is relatively cheap, it's simply impractical to bother with such complexity.