3 ms·
So software 2.0 is huge and inefficient. It is nondeterministic. It is not reproducible. It is not correct (with the same definition of correct used for usual s
by vrighter 1y ago
So software 2.0 is huge and inefficient. It is nondeterministic. It is not reproducible. It is not correct (with the same definition of correct used for usual stuff. I.E. If there is a right answer, it will give that one and only ever that one). It is not auditable. It is not modifiable in a targeted manner. It offers literally zero guarantees about anything it might (or might not) do.
This reeks
- sandspar 1y agoIt might help to see it as a new thing. True, it doesn't have all the strengths of software. Plus you're right, it has many new weaknesses! But it also has new strengths. And I'd bet that the people of tomorrow will invent some pretty cool things with it.
- vrighter 1y agoWhat are the strengths? And saving developer time is not one of them. This is assuming that reviewing and understanding the code (properly) takes as much time as actually writing it. (If it's not, then you're not saving work, you're skipping work)