4 ms·

Again, I pointed out ICE is enforcing US law, and you responded with an article about Colorado law. In a different time, public officials in such a situation w

Again, I pointed out ICE is enforcing US law, and you responded with an article about Colorado law. In a different time, public officials in such a situation would have demurred with a deft "I've read the Constitution."[1][2] I wonder what changed. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_preemption https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_preemption [2] https://nationalpolice.org/federal-supremacy-how-conflicting-laws-affect-law-enforcement-officers/ https://nationalpolice.org/federal-supremacy-how-conflicting...

someothherguyy 1y ago
Sure, I am familiar. The law prevents Colorado's agencies from sharing information with ICE, instead ICE uses LexisNexis. This can lead to things like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._ICE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._ICE https://www.latimes.com/archives/story/2018-04-27/ice-held-an-american-man-in-custody-for-1273-days https://www.latimes.com/archives/story/2018-04-27/ice-held-a...