3 ms·
it's really low in the amyloid field, especially for a fairly well regarded lab. and i have no compunction spreading what you call "anti-science propaganda".
by throwawaymaths 1y ago
it's really low in the amyloid field, especially for a fairly well regarded lab.
and i have no compunction spreading what you call "anti-science propaganda". the scientists deserve what i dish, given their behaviour.
it is, if anything, anti-intellectual to attempt to discredit real criticism of the scientific system that has real rational basis with low content slogans like "anti-science" that go against the very nature of science the process. youre only circling the wagons because you know youve done fucked up.
- searine 1y agoIt's an average citation count. I am in no way discrediting them. If anything, I am praising the article you posted for contributing to the progress of knowledge sharing and showing how it caused change. Change brought by the very system you're saying is broken. >youre only circling the wagons because you know youve done fucked up. This narrow-view attitude is going to be the death of science in America.