4 ms·
I'm genuinely confused and need some perspective from this community. I spent months building Smarketly after watching my own products fail due to terrible mark
by abilafredkb 1y ago
I'm genuinely confused and need some perspective from this community.
I spent months building Smarketly after watching my own products fail due to terrible marketing. The problem seemed obvious: technical founders (like me) can build great products but have no clue how to find customers. We waste time posting in random communities, write awkward outreach messages, and generally suck at getting our work seen.
So I built a tool that systematically solves this:
Finds communities where your actual customers hang out
Helps write personalized outreach that doesn't sound spammy
Generates marketing content including videos
Gives step-by-step strategies based on your stage
I thought through every pain point I experienced and addressed them. I validated the idea by talking to dozens of founders who all said "I need exactly this."
But here's what's driving me crazy: people won't sign up. I get traffic, positive feedback, "this looks great!" comments... then nothing. Maybe 2-3% convert to even trying the free tier.
I'm starting to question everything. Maybe the problem isn't as big as I thought? Maybe founders prefer struggling with marketing over using tools? Maybe I'm solving a "nice to have" instead of a "must have"?
I've been building products for years, but this disconnect between expressed need and actual behavior is breaking my brain. When people say they desperately need help with marketing but won't try a free tool that addresses their exact complaints, what's really going on?
Has anyone else experienced this gap between what people say they want and what they actually do? How do you tell the difference between real problems and problems people just like complaining about?
I'm genuinely lost here and could use some brutal honesty from this community.
- jamesgill 1y agoYour startup...built a tool to help solve marketing problems for startups and...you're having trouble marketing it to startups? Did I hear you right?
- abilafredkb 1y agoSounds absurd but yes.... I'm not even sure how to explain it anymore. Maybe marketing is harder than i thought
- owebmaster 1y agoWhat do you want, guaranteed success? Of course marketing is harder than you thought, starting by creating a good product. GPT wrappers for content creation was a thing 2 years ago.
- abilafredkb 1y agoFair point about expectations.I definitely thought this would be easier than it is. On the GPT wrapper comment though, I built this because existing tools weren't solving my actual problem. Maybe I'm wrong about the market need, but it's not just repackaged ChatGPT. Either way, you're right that good product execution is just the starting line, not the finish line.
- bitpush 1y agoThat's not odd at all? The mechanic who builds and understands cars, need not be the best driver. Someone who makes tractors might not be the best farmer. Same for a piano and a musician. Just because you can make a tool doesn't mean you are the best at using it.
- jamesgill 1y agoJust because you can make a tool doesn't mean you are the best at using it. Forget 'being best at using'; has the tool worked for you at all? In this case, the answer is no. So why would I buy it, then?
- abilafredkb 1y agoYou're absolutely right, and I appreciate the honesty. The tool hasn't actually worked for me yet - I've been so focused on building features and trying to help others that I haven't spent nearly enough time learning to use it myself properly. That's probably the real problem. I'm asking people to trust a marketing tool when I'm clearly still figuring out marketing myself. I think I need to step back, actually use my own product consistently for a few months, and get good at this before expecting anyone else to believe in it. Thanks for calling that out - sometimes you need someone to state the obvious thing you're avoiding.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- ahazred8ta 1y agoHe's got a plausibility argument that it should work; the jury is still out on whether it does work.