5 ms·
the deciding metric here is how old are they when they start wanting children. naturally, that factor is ignored, because it's politically incorrect to discuss
by unstablediffusi 1y ago
the deciding metric here is how old are they when they start wanting children. naturally, that factor is ignored, because it's politically incorrect to discuss it for a number of reasons.
a woman in her thirties has very slim chances to find a partner because men in their thirties have unlimited access to an unlimited number of women in their twenties. it's a harsh truth, but burying one's head in the sand doesn't really help.
- lmm 1y ago> men in their thirties have unlimited access to an unlimited number of women in their twenties On the contrary. Maybe the most desirable 20% do, but many men in their thirties have very little access to women of any age.
- unstablediffusi 1y agoyes, there certain discrepancies between what men and women consider desirable in a partner, but we aren't really allowed to discuss this on the internet without certain folx coming out of the woods to claim that 2+2=5. still, your claim does not invalidate my point, does it?
- lmm 1y ago"There are no men available" and "women do not want the men who are available" are quite different situations with different solution spaces.
- unstablediffusi 1y agono, no, my point was neither of those things. my point was that "women past a certain age have slim chances of finding a man who would be willing to have children with them," and I don't think it's a particularly outrageous or controversial statement.
- lmm 1y agoThen perhaps we have a real disagreement. I think for the vast majority of women over 30 there is a ready supply of men who would be willing to have children with them - just not men that those women would condescend to have children with.
- unstablediffusi 1y agowhich doesn't invalidate my point, does it? :) I don't know where is that you live that men are so desperate and eager to commit to low-value women, but in the world I live in, men in their thirties are unmarried and/or childless by choice.
- disgruntledphd2 1y agoCultures differ wildly across the world. Where I live, the median age for a male to get married is 37, and the median age for women is 33 or so, so I would suggest that you not be so dogmatic (as an aside, US people seem to marry absurdly early for my tastes).
- lmm 1y ago> which doesn't invalidate my point, does it? Yes, it very much does?
- disgruntledphd2 1y ago> a woman in her thirties has very slim chances to find a partner because men in their thirties have unlimited access to an unlimited number of women in their twenties. This is utter nonsense. I met my now wife at 31, and can assure you that I had little to no interest in 20 somethings at that point (having made those mistakes in the past). Clearly you live in a very different world from me, or you're just trolling (more likely given the green account name).
- unstablediffusi 1y ago[flagged]
- Tadpole9181 1y agoOh, good, now we're slut shaming women.
- unstablediffusi 1y ago[flagged]