3 ms·
I can’t tell if you’re American, but we here * We value human life over property * We only empower police to use lethal force to prevent that person from taki
by khazhoux 1y ago
I can’t tell if you’re American, but we here
* We value human life over property
* We only empower police to use lethal force to prevent that person from taking a life.
Seems you’d like to change this? Enough’s enough, steal a TV and you die on the spot?
- anon84873628 1y agoNever mind that civil unrest doesn't start out of nowhere... It's because the government is doing something unjust already.
- speakfreely 1y agoExcept in this case, they were just enforcing existing immigration laws.
- mrguyorama 1y agoThey were not. Obama deported millions with relatively little pushback. Because he did not deny anyone due process. Everybody has a requirement for due process. It's the only constitutional way to prove someone is an illegal alien, or overstayed their welcome, or has a history. You cannot "enforce existing immigration laws" by ignoring due process, because they are a requirement of existing immigration laws
- speakfreely 1y ago> Obama deported millions with relatively little pushback. Because he did not deny anyone due process. This is blatantly inaccurate. Obama administration frequently used expedited removal to deport people without hearings. Don't take my word for it, a simple Google search will serve you well.
- johnnyanmac 1y agoexisting laws require permits, and don't let them raid elementary schools for minors and courthouses for those going through the legal process. We just "mistakenly" sent a US ciizen to a foreign country to a month, ignoring a 9-0 Supreme court order to delay the process to bring him home. If this is action you agree with, just say so. But the books do not support this.
- nradov 1y agoThere is no law against apprehending illegal aliens in courthouses. It might be a bad idea in terms of optics and public policy but it doesn't appear to be specifically illegal.
- monero-xmr 1y ago[flagged]
- KittenInABox 1y agoDo not split. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Split https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Split
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- rixed 1y agoI envy the simple world in which you live. In mine, assault rifles ruin even more innocent people lives.
- kalkin 1y agoI'm confused-do you support peaceful protest, or do you think that protests always descend into anarchy and require assault rifles to be brought out to kill some people? What if police attack a peaceful protest--say trampling a lone person with horses (https://www.newsweek.com/la-protestor-stomped-police-horseback-violence-video-2082637 https://www.newsweek.com/la-protestor-stomped-police-horseba...) or shooting a reporter standing by herself (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/reporter-los-angeles-protests-rubber-bullet-lauren-tomasi-9news-australia/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/reporter-los-angeles-protests-r...)? Is there an assault-rifle shaped solution to this kind of anarchy?
- anigbrowl 1y agoHow many people should have been shot on January 6 2021? If this is what you actually think, please make an affirmative statement saying lots of people should have been shot. If you won't, then I can't really take your statement above seriously.
- cjbgkagh 1y agoWe can’t have people going around and killing other people, but we can’t have people going around and destroying property. It might sound noble to have this idea that we would always put life ahead of property but many of us have property valuable enough that it could be cashed in and used to save lives yet we chose not to do so. I think people are far more ready to spend on virtue with the destruction of others property rather than their own.