2 ms·
You do, however, have $160k worth of software that is generating ~$16k/mo in revenue (or more since you presumably did not make that $200k evenly spread out acr
by ndriscoll 1y ago
You do, however, have $160k worth of software that is generating ~$16k/mo in revenue (or more since you presumably did not make that $200k evenly spread out across year 1 while you were developing the software), so in year 2 you could halt further development, use a loan to get through the 2 months it takes to make the money to pay your taxes, and then make $176k profit. Then you pay your taxes on year 2 and walk away with $152k in the bank along with $120k worth of software asset.
(Of course an asset that generates $200k/year is actually worth far more than $200k, so in that case 20% depreciation seems even more absurd)
- 8note 1y agothe required thing here of "lay off or fire all the developers" isnt a great result though
- Dylan16807 1y ago> You do, however, have $160k worth of software That is a huge assumption that is probably not true. > in year 2 you could halt further development, use a loan to get through the 2 months it takes to make the money to pay your taxes, and then make $176k profit. This is almost certainly not true.