3 ms·
If you actually know the answer to this, you should probably publish a paper on it. The conditions that truly create intelligence is… not well understood.
by pennomi 1y ago
If you actually know the answer to this, you should probably publish a paper on it. The conditions that truly create intelligence is… not well understood.
- AlecSchueler 1y agoThat's actually the point I was making. There's an assumption that the LLM is working differently because there's a statistical model but we lack the understanding of our own intelligence to be able to say this is indeed a difference.
- freejazz 1y agoSo? There is no more evidence to suggest they are the same than what you've already rejected here as evidencing difference.
- AlecSchueler 1y agoI know but I didn't claim they were the same, I simply questioned the position that they were different. The fact is we don't know, so it seems like a poor basis for building off of
- freejazz 1y agoYeah, going either way. Let it not be mentioned at all, imo.
- munksbeer 1y agoTo me a more interesting observation, one that is already discussed a lot, is that if eventually we cannot tell the difference between a machine and a human in terms of output, then when do we accept that "thinking" has subjective, rather than objective?