3 ms·
FPTP is what makes Reform so dangerous though. They have a real chance of having a lot of power. In a proportional representation system where parties have to s
by solumunus 1y ago
FPTP is what makes Reform so dangerous though. They have a real chance of having a lot of power. In a proportional representation system where parties have to share power in coalitions these extreme parties actually have to be involved in government, at which point they’re exposed as completely incompetent. See the Netherlands right now for example. I would rather have these extreme positions represented, because they will be represented poorly. It takes wind out of the populist sails, where they can no longer simply promise everything until they’re in power and completely destroy the country.
- 0xDEAFBEAD 1y agoI think FPTP ends up working out a lot different in the parliamentary context. The US only has 2 parties in Congress, despite FPTP. In terms of strength of 3rd parties, I'd say they are generally quite weak in the US system, somewhat stronger in a proportional representation parliamentary system, and potentially overpowered in a FPTP parliament like in the UK. Historically I believe the 2-party system in the US was pretty good at tamping down on extremism, but recently the 2 major parties have acquired too many extremists.
- zimpenfish 1y ago> the 2 major parties have acquired too many extremists. You're blaming both parties for where the US is now?
- 0xDEAFBEAD 1y agoYep, see here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44216278 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44216278
- solumunus 1y agoMAGA is basically a reaction to the far left.