18 ms·
5 years ago a person would be blown away by today’s LLMs. But people today will merely say “cool” at whatever LLMs are in use 5 years from now. Or maybe not eve
by deadbabe 1y ago
5 years ago a person would be blown away by today’s LLMs. But people today will merely say “cool” at whatever LLMs are in use 5 years from now. Or maybe not even that.
- dingnuts 1y ago5 years ago GPT2 was already outputting largely coherent speech, there's been progress but it's not all that shocking
- tptacek 1y agoMost of the developers I know personally who have been radicalized by coding agents, it happened within the past 9 months. It does not feel like we are in a phase of predictable boring improvement.
- keybored 1y agoRadicalized? Going with the flow and wishes of the people who are driving AI is the opposite of that. To have their minds changed drastically, sure..
- tptacek 1y agoSorry I have no idea what you're trying to say here.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 1y ago> very different from the usual or traditional https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/radical https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/radical Deciding that AI is going nowhere to suddenly deciding that coding agents are how they will work going forward is a radical change. That is what they meant.
- keybored 1y agoDid you miss my second paragraph? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/paragraph https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/paragraph
- Dylan16807 1y agoCan you explain exactly what you meant by your second paragraph? The ambiguity is why you got that reply. If your second paragraph makes that reply irrelevant, are you saying the meaning was "Your use of 'radicalized' is technically correct but I still think you shouldn't have used it here"?
- dwaltrip 1y agoBold prediction…