4 ms·

I think it's not the one to blame who broke this but those who implemented everything all the time without adding any tests. Xorg has quite a large codebase but

by micw 1y ago

I think it's not the one to blame who broke this but those who implemented everything all the time without adding any tests. Xorg has quite a large codebase but almost no automated tests.

cwillu 1y ago
So we agree that the maintainer is at fault: he wanted to change things and not have to thoroughly test his changes by doing the boring work of adding test coverage to the modified area.
- bmacho 1y ago
  There is no arguing about that, the maintainer made a mistake. (Among other people, and it was insignificant anyway.) So now that we agree on this, what now? How exactly does > does not give a warm fuzzy feeling about the author of the at-fault patch leading a fork. follow? E.g. do you think that none of the Wayland developers ever made any mistakes?