5 ms·

Really just get off meta platforms

kennywinker 1y ago
Network effects have most people stuck on at least one of them. If all your friends use instagram/fb/whatsapp to keep in touch / make plans, leaving the platform is akin to cutting ties with your community. Which is why there is a role for gov in regulating privacy and mandating interop between platforms. Asking people to “just stop using them” isn’t a realistic ask.
- 8fingerlouie 1y ago
  Besides that, pretty much everything “after school” is being arranged over Facebook, as well as community “blogs”, newsletters etc. Facebook solves this problem extremely well. I still remember the “good old days” of poorly managed Wordpress sites, shared Google calendars, mailing lists, and texts, and I’m not particularly keen on going back to that. The sad truth is that there is nothing on the market today that solves this problem in a combined package, and you can add discoverability to the mix. If you’re interested in X you can search for it on Facebook and 9/10 times you’ll find what you’re looking for, from menus for restaurants to opening hours. Yes, Google does this as well but somehow people (here) are more aware of the feature on Facebook.
  - rel_ic 1y ago
    Yeah, it's a tradeoff. I don't mean to be glib, but on one side we have a loneliness epidemic, mass misinformation campaigns, and centralized control, and on the other side we have better information about restaurants, easier after-school arrangements, and community blogs. I really don't mean to say that the benefits are not real benefits - they are! I just think their price is way too high.
  - a57721 1y ago
    I would rather prefer the good old days with wonky WordPress sites and mailing lists. It is true that most business owners moved to Facebook at some point, but the price to pay is having all content undiscoverable and inaccessible, unless your user has a Facebook account.
- WolfeReader 1y ago
  Actually it is very realistic to stop using Meta products - I've done it. And the more people stop, the less effective the network effect becomes.
  - rel_ic 1y ago
    People in my community are bragging about getting off social media - it's like a new status symbol around here.
    - deleted 1y ago
      [deleted]
  - walthamstow 1y ago
    Being off their social media products is one thing, I am myself, but being off of WhatsApp is like being off the grid in most countries.
  - JambalayaJimbo 1y ago
    In the early 2010s not being on Facebook meant you couldn’t really engage with university clubs, neighborhood groups, etc. Now a lot of that stuff is on WhatsApp.
- rel_ic 1y ago
  I want to push back on this narrative - I got off facebook and now my friends just text me instead. A few of my friends also got off facebook. Sometimes I can't see a facebook event so I text a friend asking for details. It's fine.
  - reaperducer 1y ago
    I'm with you. But it doesn't work 100%. I dumped Meta probably a decade ago, and anyone who wants to get in touch with me does so through e-mail. But I still have two relatives stuck on FB Messenger. Even if I contact them via SMS, they still respond to my dormant account in FB Messenger, because Messenger is where all of their friends are. To them, it's the only messaging app, and have no idea why it doesn't work sending messages to me.
  - hbn 1y ago
    Of the people who accumulated in my Facebook friends list over the years, the only ones I know who actively use Facebook still are almost entirely using it to have stupid political arguments with each other. It really has snowballed and bred derangement.
  - Drew_ 1y ago
    You can enable email notifications specifically for Facebook events btw. I quit, but leave that enabled.
  - homebrewer 1y ago
    In some countries it has become difficult to live without a WhatsApp account. I'm doing it, but it's a pain since WhatsApp is used for everything that phone calls were once used for: schedule appointments, keep in contact with your kids' teachers, buy and sell goods, etc. The same numbers often won't pick up the call, or it will be simply turned off (since it's used just for WhatsApp). Imagine living without a phone, or whatever is equally important in your area. Sure, it is possible, if you're at the right level of masochism.
  - int_19h 1y ago
    Facebook isn't the worst of it. WhatsApp is, in those areas where it is the de facto standard app for texting. This is not the case for Americans so they are mostly blissfully unaware of it, but just imagine literally not being able to text anyone.
- add-sub-mul-div 1y ago
  It's not wrong to ask people to be leaders instead of followers. The message and pressure will sometimes get through. It's better than doing nothing.
- platevoltage 1y ago
  I finally ripped the bandaid off with Instagram early this year. I can't say it's done wonders for my social life. Mental health has been a lot better though.
- gs17 1y ago
  Yep, I've tried, but if I say, e.g. "let's use Matrix!" it ends up being the app they only have to talk to me, and most of what they say is "why can't you use the app everyone else uses". Most people already have a second choice that isn't much better than a Meta app (or is also Meta).
bigshot 1y ago
Only reason I use it is because of my meta ray bans. Once a competitive product comes out I’ll delete app immediately.
zer0zzz 1y ago
I agree, but I am more of the mindset that we should be getting off all platforms if possible.
127dot1 1y ago
And from Mozilla business as well
cypherpunks01 1y ago
Reminds me of the story the other day, "Meta found 'covertly tracking' Android users through Instagram and Facebook" with the STUN requests being sent from web pixels back to localhost Meta apps (FB/IG). I just don't think anyone can be using Facebook/IG, especially persistent mobile apps, while have any real concern about tracking. Does FB still run their Tor onion service? That seemed to be the only possible way to use these products in the past without being subject to extreme tracking.
pier25 1y ago
Most of the world outside of the US runs on Whatsapp. SMS is not an option because, again outside of the US, people pay by SMS sent. There are plans for Whatsapp interop but probably only in the EU. https://www.wired.com/story/whatsapp-interoperability-messaging/ https://www.wired.com/story/whatsapp-interoperability-messag...
- barbazoo 1y ago
  Signal exists, Telegram exists, and many providers are actually not charging per sms.
  - dhritzkiv 1y ago
    In many countries, WhatsApp's data usage is zero-rated, which makes WhatsApp more attractive than Signal, Telegram, etc.
    - mmmlinux 1y ago
      sounds like a bit of a government sanctioned monopoly.
      - DoctorOW 1y ago
        I mean for context, in those countries Meta paid to setup these networks. They're not a government-enforced monopoly, you're more than welcome to start a competing network.
        1oooqooq 1y ago
        they did this while the usa public was up in arms against them doing this in India. meanwhile meta was eating south America, eu, Africa...
  - pier25 1y ago
    Whatsapp has 3 billion active users. Countries like Mexico or Spain have adopted it as the default form of messaging. Only today I used it to chat with our lawn maintenance guy, our car washer, and someone who's repairing our espresso machine. I could maybe try to convince friends and family to use another app but I won't be convincing an entire country.
vachina 1y ago
Don’t get off meta, leech off of it. Don’t contribute any posts, comment, or any behavioral signal. Use the webapp, use them in separate, private browsing containers (if able). Uninstall and eradicate all Meta apps from your devices.

Network effects have most people stuck on at least one of them. If all your friends use instagram/fb/whatsapp to keep in touch / make plans, leaving the platform is akin to cutting ties with your community. Which is why there is a role for gov in regulating privacy and mandating interop between platforms. Asking people to “just stop using them” isn’t a realistic ask.

8fingerlouie 1y ago
Besides that, pretty much everything “after school” is being arranged over Facebook, as well as community “blogs”, newsletters etc. Facebook solves this problem extremely well. I still remember the “good old days” of poorly managed Wordpress sites, shared Google calendars, mailing lists, and texts, and I’m not particularly keen on going back to that. The sad truth is that there is nothing on the market today that solves this problem in a combined package, and you can add discoverability to the mix. If you’re interested in X you can search for it on Facebook and 9/10 times you’ll find what you’re looking for, from menus for restaurants to opening hours. Yes, Google does this as well but somehow people (here) are more aware of the feature on Facebook.
- rel_ic 1y ago
  Yeah, it's a tradeoff. I don't mean to be glib, but on one side we have a loneliness epidemic, mass misinformation campaigns, and centralized control, and on the other side we have better information about restaurants, easier after-school arrangements, and community blogs. I really don't mean to say that the benefits are not real benefits - they are! I just think their price is way too high.
- a57721 1y ago
  I would rather prefer the good old days with wonky WordPress sites and mailing lists. It is true that most business owners moved to Facebook at some point, but the price to pay is having all content undiscoverable and inaccessible, unless your user has a Facebook account.
WolfeReader 1y ago
Actually it is very realistic to stop using Meta products - I've done it. And the more people stop, the less effective the network effect becomes.
- rel_ic 1y ago
  People in my community are bragging about getting off social media - it's like a new status symbol around here.
  - deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
- walthamstow 1y ago
  Being off their social media products is one thing, I am myself, but being off of WhatsApp is like being off the grid in most countries.
- JambalayaJimbo 1y ago
  In the early 2010s not being on Facebook meant you couldn’t really engage with university clubs, neighborhood groups, etc. Now a lot of that stuff is on WhatsApp.
rel_ic 1y ago
I want to push back on this narrative - I got off facebook and now my friends just text me instead. A few of my friends also got off facebook. Sometimes I can't see a facebook event so I text a friend asking for details. It's fine.
- reaperducer 1y ago
  I'm with you. But it doesn't work 100%. I dumped Meta probably a decade ago, and anyone who wants to get in touch with me does so through e-mail. But I still have two relatives stuck on FB Messenger. Even if I contact them via SMS, they still respond to my dormant account in FB Messenger, because Messenger is where all of their friends are. To them, it's the only messaging app, and have no idea why it doesn't work sending messages to me.
- hbn 1y ago
  Of the people who accumulated in my Facebook friends list over the years, the only ones I know who actively use Facebook still are almost entirely using it to have stupid political arguments with each other. It really has snowballed and bred derangement.
- Drew_ 1y ago
  You can enable email notifications specifically for Facebook events btw. I quit, but leave that enabled.
- homebrewer 1y ago
  In some countries it has become difficult to live without a WhatsApp account. I'm doing it, but it's a pain since WhatsApp is used for everything that phone calls were once used for: schedule appointments, keep in contact with your kids' teachers, buy and sell goods, etc. The same numbers often won't pick up the call, or it will be simply turned off (since it's used just for WhatsApp). Imagine living without a phone, or whatever is equally important in your area. Sure, it is possible, if you're at the right level of masochism.
- int_19h 1y ago
  Facebook isn't the worst of it. WhatsApp is, in those areas where it is the de facto standard app for texting. This is not the case for Americans so they are mostly blissfully unaware of it, but just imagine literally not being able to text anyone.
add-sub-mul-div 1y ago
It's not wrong to ask people to be leaders instead of followers. The message and pressure will sometimes get through. It's better than doing nothing.
platevoltage 1y ago
I finally ripped the bandaid off with Instagram early this year. I can't say it's done wonders for my social life. Mental health has been a lot better though.
gs17 1y ago
Yep, I've tried, but if I say, e.g. "let's use Matrix!" it ends up being the app they only have to talk to me, and most of what they say is "why can't you use the app everyone else uses". Most people already have a second choice that isn't much better than a Meta app (or is also Meta).

bigshot 1y ago

Only reason I use it is because of my meta ray bans. Once a competitive product comes out I’ll delete app immediately.

zer0zzz 1y ago

I agree, but I am more of the mindset that we should be getting off all platforms if possible.

127dot1 1y ago

And from Mozilla business as well

cypherpunks01 1y ago

Reminds me of the story the other day, "Meta found 'covertly tracking' Android users through Instagram and Facebook" with the STUN requests being sent from web pixels back to localhost Meta apps (FB/IG). I just don't think anyone can be using Facebook/IG, especially persistent mobile apps, while have any real concern about tracking. Does FB still run their Tor onion service? That seemed to be the only possible way to use these products in the past without being subject to extreme tracking.

pier25 1y ago

Most of the world outside of the US runs on Whatsapp. SMS is not an option because, again outside of the US, people pay by SMS sent. There are plans for Whatsapp interop but probably only in the EU. https://www.wired.com/story/whatsapp-interoperability-messaging/ https://www.wired.com/story/whatsapp-interoperability-messag...

barbazoo 1y ago
Signal exists, Telegram exists, and many providers are actually not charging per sms.
- dhritzkiv 1y ago
  In many countries, WhatsApp's data usage is zero-rated, which makes WhatsApp more attractive than Signal, Telegram, etc.
  - mmmlinux 1y ago
    sounds like a bit of a government sanctioned monopoly.
    - DoctorOW 1y ago
      I mean for context, in those countries Meta paid to setup these networks. They're not a government-enforced monopoly, you're more than welcome to start a competing network.
      - 1oooqooq 1y ago
        they did this while the usa public was up in arms against them doing this in India. meanwhile meta was eating south America, eu, Africa...
- pier25 1y ago
  Whatsapp has 3 billion active users. Countries like Mexico or Spain have adopted it as the default form of messaging. Only today I used it to chat with our lawn maintenance guy, our car washer, and someone who's repairing our espresso machine. I could maybe try to convince friends and family to use another app but I won't be convincing an entire country.

vachina 1y ago

Don’t get off meta, leech off of it. Don’t contribute any posts, comment, or any behavioral signal. Use the webapp, use them in separate, private browsing containers (if able). Uninstall and eradicate all Meta apps from your devices.