3 ms·
You mean the 5 years old 1 person's experiment [0] or the more recent 1 year old POC [1]. Would you build a product with either of these things and sell it and
by mk89 1y ago
You mean the 5 years old 1 person's experiment [0] or the more recent 1 year old POC [1].
Would you build a product with either of these things and sell it and put your name on it? I wouldn't.
[0] https://github.com/therecipe/flutter https://github.com/therecipe/flutter
[1]: https://github.com/KDABLabs/dart-qtbindings https://github.com/KDABLabs/dart-qtbindings
- refulgentis 1y agoYeah, and I agree with you, I would think its nuts too. A couple years ago I didn't have any experience to tell me otherwise and would never have done that -- I'm only up for it now because I've had a great and literally painless time wrapping ONNX, llama.cpp, and a couple other C++ libraries using generated bindings. I agree strongly on that it is good to make software architectural decisions, involving business, based on if you have a bunch of other people with the same problem shape as you. And on specifically the idea that Darts not exactly hosting multiple UI frameworks, even though it theoretically could. (I don't know enough about Qt to know who uses it and why, my understanding vaguely is Linux UI. Canonical is all-in on Flutter, for whatever reason, so I discount the probability that Dart would naturally gain Qt bindings, if it was non-small)