3 ms·

Xcode is probably like, one of the top… 3? 5? biggest macOS-native applications in the world. Making it cross-platform would require either reimplementing it f

by klausa 1y ago

Xcode is probably like, one of the top… 3? 5? biggest macOS-native applications in the world. Making it cross-platform would require either reimplementing it from scratch, or doing a Safari-on-Windows level of shenanigans of reimplementing AppKit on other platforms.

AdamN 1y ago
Xcode on Windows/Linux would be wacky and not worth the effort - it's very tightly coupled to MacOS so effectively impossible imho. People targeting MacOS/iOS aren't typically running Windows on the desktop. The more critical thing to meeting developers where they are would be for the entire developer loop to be doable from a JetBrains IDE on MacOS.
- cosmic_cheese 1y ago
  > People targeting MacOS/iOS aren't typically running Windows on the desktop. Or if they are, they're treating macOS/iOS as “blind targets” where those platforms are rarely if ever QA’d or dogfooded. > The more critical thing to meeting developers where they are would be for the entire developer loop to be doable from a JetBrains IDE on MacOS. I think most current Apple platform devs would be happiest if they were equipped with the tools to build their own IDEs/toolchains/etc, so e.g. Panic's Nova could feasibly have an iOS/macOS/etc dev plugin or someone could turn Sublime Text into a minimalistic Apple platform IDE. JetBrains IDEs certainly have a wide following but among the longtime Mac user devs in particular they’re not seen as quite the panacea they’re presented as in the larger dev community.
rafram 1y ago
> Safari-on-Windows level of shenanigans of reimplementing AppKit on other platforms I was curious about this, so I downloaded it to take a look. It doesn't look like they actually shipped AppKit, at least as a separate DLL, but they did ship DLLs for Foundation, Core Graphics, and a few other core macOS frameworks.
- quux 1y ago
  Yep they did. I think those dlls are have their origin in NeXT’s Openstep for Windows product, which let you develop windows apps using the NeXT APIs.

by klausa 1y ago

AdamN 1y ago

Xcode on Windows/Linux would be wacky and not worth the effort - it's very tightly coupled to MacOS so effectively impossible imho. People targeting MacOS/iOS aren't typically running Windows on the desktop. The more critical thing to meeting developers where they are would be for the entire developer loop to be doable from a JetBrains IDE on MacOS.

cosmic_cheese 1y ago
> People targeting MacOS/iOS aren't typically running Windows on the desktop. Or if they are, they're treating macOS/iOS as “blind targets” where those platforms are rarely if ever QA’d or dogfooded. > The more critical thing to meeting developers where they are would be for the entire developer loop to be doable from a JetBrains IDE on MacOS. I think most current Apple platform devs would be happiest if they were equipped with the tools to build their own IDEs/toolchains/etc, so e.g. Panic's Nova could feasibly have an iOS/macOS/etc dev plugin or someone could turn Sublime Text into a minimalistic Apple platform IDE. JetBrains IDEs certainly have a wide following but among the longtime Mac user devs in particular they’re not seen as quite the panacea they’re presented as in the larger dev community.

rafram 1y ago

> Safari-on-Windows level of shenanigans of reimplementing AppKit on other platforms I was curious about this, so I downloaded it to take a look. It doesn't look like they actually shipped AppKit, at least as a separate DLL, but they did ship DLLs for Foundation, Core Graphics, and a few other core macOS frameworks.

quux 1y ago
Yep they did. I think those dlls are have their origin in NeXT’s Openstep for Windows product, which let you develop windows apps using the NeXT APIs.