4 ms·
The AI skeptics are the ones who never develop the skill though, it's self-destructive.
by kristofferR 1y ago
The AI skeptics are the ones who never develop the skill though, it's self-destructive.
- caycep 1y agoif one needs special "skill" to use AI "properly", is it truly AI?
- HappMacDonald 1y agoHuman labor needs skill to compose properly into any larger effort..
- wickedsight 1y agoTesler's Theorem strikes again!
- Filligree 1y agoGiven one needs "communications skills" to work effectively with subordinates, are subordinates truly intelligent?
- caycep 1y agobut then, if one needs to change communications style from human to AI, does this ethos then get tossed to the wind? https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/23/75 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/23/75
- jvanderbot 1y agoPeople treat this as some kind of all or nothing. I _do_ us LLM/AI all the time for development, but the agentic "fire and forget" model doesn't help much. I will circle back every so often. It's not a horrible experience for greenfield work. A sort of "Start a boilerplate project that does X, but stop short of implementing A B or C". It's an assistant, then I take the work from there to make sure I know what's being built. Fine! A combo of using web ui / cli for asking layout and doc questions + in-ide tab-complete is still better for me. The fabled 10x dev-as-ai-manager just doesn't work well yet. The responses to this complaint are usually to label one a heretic or Luddite and do the modern day workplace equivalent of "git gud", which helps absolutely nobody, and ignores that I am already quite competent at using AI for my own needs.