3 ms·
The last 10% you're referring to are nits. That's like the last 0.000001%. also, it could have fixed all these in like a minute by itself.
by winrid 1y ago
The last 10% you're referring to are nits. That's like the last 0.000001%. also, it could have fixed all these in like a minute by itself.
- suddenlybananas 1y agoWhy didn't it?
- joshka 1y agoI'm guessing that to do this would have required running codex and ensuring that the specific repo / PR context was in scope. Perhaps the dev just hasn't done this yet?
- joshka 1y agoSome of my response comments were nits where the tooling didn't respect conventions in the code / brought in conventions that weren't in use. I'd expect that minding existing conventions would be something that LLM based code tooling would eventually incorporate explicitly into its context and guardrails. Intuitively this seems like it would be a difficult thing to push down a level into a model's training for various practical reasons.