4 ms·

Since this app is inherently modal (you can only enter text when you're in an input field), it seems like a huge missed opportunity that it doesn't have VIM-sty

by notJim 14y ago

Since this app is inherently modal (you can only enter text when you're in an input field), it seems like a huge missed opportunity that it doesn't have VIM-style modal keybindings. Especially because it advertises it self as being for the text-editor set. I will say that their no-signup approach to getting you into the app is pretty great.

todd3834 14y ago
I agree, the first thing I did was to start typing vim commands just to see letters on the screen.
lazzlazzlazz 14y ago
Frankly I'm glad it's not bound to VIM — that app is already restrictive in scope to those who prefer text-editing, let alone VIM users. Thanks for a great little application!
- X6MW3aQrZU5VKkz 14y ago
  Restrictive in scope? Enable the mouse, press i and as long as you don't press escape it will be the simplest text editor you could want.
  - jcoder 14y ago
    You're right! Why complicate things by saving?
- notJim 14y ago
  For the record, I meant key combos that don't use modifiers unnecessarily, similar to GMails, where for example, just pressing “u” goes to your inbox. Modifier keys aren't necessary with modal interfaces. Of course, at that point, basing your modifier keys on VIM just makes sense :).
FuzzyDunlop 14y ago
Funnily enough, I thought a missed opportunity was using emacs' Org-mode syntax, or at the very least exporting to it.
- notJim 14y ago
  Yup, equally valid point. Org-mode is very frequently mentioned as the hacker's todo list. (apologize if that's not the correct characterization, but I am agreeing with you :) )
- endymi0n 14y ago
  I was missing the multiple cursors from Sublime... On a sidenote: Isn't it somehow funny, how the top comments on every article that remotely touches text mode or editors is an editor war? ;o)
  - cema 14y ago
    More like an editor truce this time. As long as it lasts, I concur: having built-in export/import to existing popular solutions would be very helpful.
phlyingpenguin 14y ago
Re: no-signup approach I really like the fast start, but I would MUCH prefer them to allow me to give them some login info (maybe even just Google login or something) so that I wouldn't have to save a funky URL someplace. In addition to that, the option to have multiple trees (hit the holly button) is useless since only the browser that's seen all of your trees can access all of them (without the funky URL). It would almost be a feature if you could also forget trees that you've seen (keep a work tree and a home tree, perhaps, but no work at home). I think it badly needs the option of having a login or at least an unsecure custom URL option.
- mertd 14y ago
  Because of no-signup, there is a great opportunity here for creating to-do lists for small collaborative projects. But Google-wave style simultaneous editing is not there (yet?).
  - phlyingpenguin 14y ago
    Is that really lost if there's a login that keeps track of the individual list urls? I don't think they have to become private just because they're tracked.

by notJim 14y ago

todd3834 14y ago

I agree, the first thing I did was to start typing vim commands just to see letters on the screen.

lazzlazzlazz 14y ago

Frankly I'm glad it's not bound to VIM — that app is already restrictive in scope to those who prefer text-editing, let alone VIM users. Thanks for a great little application!

X6MW3aQrZU5VKkz 14y ago
Restrictive in scope? Enable the mouse, press i and as long as you don't press escape it will be the simplest text editor you could want.
- jcoder 14y ago
  You're right! Why complicate things by saving?
notJim 14y ago
For the record, I meant key combos that don't use modifiers unnecessarily, similar to GMails, where for example, just pressing “u” goes to your inbox. Modifier keys aren't necessary with modal interfaces. Of course, at that point, basing your modifier keys on VIM just makes sense :).

FuzzyDunlop 14y ago

Funnily enough, I thought a missed opportunity was using emacs' Org-mode syntax, or at the very least exporting to it.

notJim 14y ago
Yup, equally valid point. Org-mode is very frequently mentioned as the hacker's todo list. (apologize if that's not the correct characterization, but I am agreeing with you :) )
endymi0n 14y ago
I was missing the multiple cursors from Sublime... On a sidenote: Isn't it somehow funny, how the top comments on every article that remotely touches text mode or editors is an editor war? ;o)
- cema 14y ago
  More like an editor truce this time. As long as it lasts, I concur: having built-in export/import to existing popular solutions would be very helpful.

phlyingpenguin 14y ago

Re: no-signup approach I really like the fast start, but I would MUCH prefer them to allow me to give them some login info (maybe even just Google login or something) so that I wouldn't have to save a funky URL someplace. In addition to that, the option to have multiple trees (hit the holly button) is useless since only the browser that's seen all of your trees can access all of them (without the funky URL). It would almost be a feature if you could also forget trees that you've seen (keep a work tree and a home tree, perhaps, but no work at home). I think it badly needs the option of having a login or at least an unsecure custom URL option.

mertd 14y ago
Because of no-signup, there is a great opportunity here for creating to-do lists for small collaborative projects. But Google-wave style simultaneous editing is not there (yet?).
- phlyingpenguin 14y ago
  Is that really lost if there's a login that keeps track of the individual list urls? I don't think they have to become private just because they're tracked.